| Author |
Message |
BankRollsAdvanced Member
Posts: 110 Joined: 13 Apr 2007 Location: Alpena, AR
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 4:31 am |
|
|
Could this be an early column bar,
like Bob was discussing last week?
1971-S
_________________ Faith is not a leap in the dark, but a step into the light.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Bob PSite Admin
Posts: 3482 Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Location: Niceville, Florida
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 3:50 pm |
|
|
Too early a date for the column bar cents we were discussing. The column bars came about with the adent of the single squeeze hubbing method in the middle 80s.
_________________ Bob Piazza
Site Admin/Moderator
Attributer/Photographer
bobp@coppercoins.com
mustbebob1@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
 |
BankRollsAdvanced Member
Posts: 110 Joined: 13 Apr 2007 Location: Alpena, AR
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:05 pm |
|
|
Never hurts to ask
_________________ Faith is not a leap in the dark, but a step into the light.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
DickExpert Member
Posts: 5780 Joined: 21 Sep 2006 Location: Rialto, CA.
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:55 pm |
|
|
Bob, I guess this just as well be tossed, too! It is a 1969S-1DR-00X, bar on 7th col.
I had to "doctor it to be able to show it. I'm trying to make myself into an "expert Photographer". I may need a bit more practice!
Dick
_________________ " Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before".
|
|
|
|
|
 |
coppercoinsSite Admin
Posts: 2809 Joined: 29 Jun 2003 Location: Springfield, Missouri.
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:48 am |
|
|
Those earlier dates have very deep columns compared to the modern dates, and yes, they are all spenders. I wouldn't list a column in those years unless it was very obvious under a 10X loupe.
Back away from the coins a bit and quit crossing your eyes to see micronomic doubling. Look for the more obvious stuff. If you don't notice it within a second or two, it's probably too minor.
_________________ C. D. Daughtrey
owner, developer
www.coppercoins.com
cd@coppercoins.com
|
|
|
|
|
 |
DickExpert Member
Posts: 5780 Joined: 21 Sep 2006 Location: Rialto, CA.
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 12:26 pm |
|
|
Thank you Chuck! Is the lack of depth in the outer bays, on the older coins due to over-polishing, due to a clash, or other "damage"? I have noticed thid since looking at the reverse of the coin more, of late.
Dick
_________________ " Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before".
|
|
|
|
|
 |
coppercoinsSite Admin
Posts: 2809 Joined: 29 Jun 2003 Location: Springfield, Missouri.
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 12:33 pm |
|
|
Not sure, exactly. I haven't given it much thought. I do know the relief was deeper then, and probably prone to showing clashes much better...so for the better part it's probably a result of die polishing.
_________________ C. D. Daughtrey
owner, developer
www.coppercoins.com
cd@coppercoins.com
|
|
|
|
|
 |
DickExpert Member
Posts: 5780 Joined: 21 Sep 2006 Location: Rialto, CA.
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 1:48 pm |
|
|
Chuck, this is what I was referring to:
Not as much light as I thought.
Anyway, notice the top of the bay,
the normal curvature is missing entirely.
Dick
EDIT: Better photo, but forgot the arrows, and forgot to rotate! I am learning, but ever so slowly!
_________________ " Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before".
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|