| Author |
Message |
daggitSenior Member
Posts: 560 Joined: 26 Oct 2007 Location: Canada
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:04 pm |
|
|
Hi I'm not sure which this is, notice the lines coming off of the "M" in UNUM and not as noticeable the "N"
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Bob PSite Admin
Posts: 3482 Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Location: Niceville, Florida
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 5:05 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
RhubarbSenior Member
Posts: 856 Joined: 24 Jan 2007 Location: West Georgia
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 5:54 pm |
|
|
Daggit,
What year is it? BJ will be along soon.
Rhubarb
_________________ There is no shame in not knowing; the shame lies in not finding
out.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
coopExpert Member
Posts: 3402 Joined: 17 Sep 2003 Location: Arizona
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:05 pm |
|
|
I would guess they are die scratches from cleaning to remove a clash. The reason why in that location is that the lower right edge of the bust runs close to that area. The continued scratching area would be from a strong cleaning. Thats my take on it. If it were die wear, the other devices would be affected and I don't see that except on the M. A closer examination on the area East of the UNUM would probably have more of these scratches also. They do flatten with time, except next to the devices.
_________________ Richard S. Cooper
You may be only one person in the world, but you may also be the world to one person.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
daggitSenior Member
Posts: 560 Joined: 26 Oct 2007 Location: Canada
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 9:33 pm |
|
|
| Rhubarb wrote: |
Daggit,
What year is it? BJ will be along soon.
Rhubarb |
Hi, sorry was doing good remembering to put the dates, its a 1979. I just read some of the posts and now realize it was highly improbable seeing how earliest known trail dies are in the early 80's.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
wavysteps2003Expert Member
Posts: 1344 Joined: 25 Feb 2005
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 7:13 am |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|