| Author |
Message |
nds76New Member
Posts: 5 Joined: 17 Mar 2008
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 8:45 pm |
|
|
Any comments? The reverse of the coin is normal. Also one side of the coin is thicker than the other. Is this something worthy enough to be slabbed? How much could something like this be worth?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
mikediamondAdvanced Member
Posts: 191 Joined: 09 Oct 2003 Location: Western Illinois
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 8:04 am |
|
|
It's a horizontal misalignment of the obverse (hammer) die. It's worth around $5, so don't bother slabbing it. 1966 produced a bumper crop of misaligned die errors in Lincoln cents.
_________________ President of CONECA; Host of Error Coin Information Exchange (Yahoo:Groups). Opinions rendered do not necessarily reflect those held by any organization I am a member of.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
KurtSSenior Member
Posts: 875 Joined: 15 Feb 2008
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:52 am |
|
|
Really--such a severe misalignment is common for '66?
I'm going to check around and see if these are for sale.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
coopExpert Member
Posts: 3402 Joined: 17 Sep 2003 Location: Arizona
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 3:38 pm |
|
|
Its one of the strongest I've seen. Nice find. I would save it.
Welcome to the forum. Always great to have a coin that other will appreciate on your first post.
_________________ Richard S. Cooper
You may be only one person in the world, but you may also be the world to one person.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
nds76New Member
Posts: 5 Joined: 17 Mar 2008
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:00 am |
|
|
|
Thanks for your input. I was really hoping I could get a nice premium for this.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
mikediamondAdvanced Member
Posts: 191 Joined: 09 Oct 2003 Location: Western Illinois
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:21 am |
|
|
Misalignments have to be much greater than this to generate a substantial premium. Misalignments of 20-25% can bring over $100. The largest I've seen on a U.S. coin is 40%
_________________ President of CONECA; Host of Error Coin Information Exchange (Yahoo:Groups). Opinions rendered do not necessarily reflect those held by any organization I am a member of.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
RhubarbSenior Member
Posts: 856 Joined: 24 Jan 2007 Location: West Georgia
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 9:27 am |
|
|
Welcome to the forum NDS76. Nice find.
Rhubarb
_________________ There is no shame in not knowing; the shame lies in not finding
out.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
eagamesExpert Member
Posts: 3013 Joined: 15 Nov 2005
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 1:19 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
nds76New Member
Posts: 5 Joined: 17 Mar 2008
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 4:12 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
coopExpert Member
Posts: 3402 Joined: 17 Sep 2003 Location: Arizona
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 12:04 am |
|
|
That one seems to be more MAD than your coin. If there are markers that are visable you might check to see if it was from the same die. Chances are slim though with the number of die made each year. I think the price on Ebay is unrealistic. Still a nice find if you got it in change. Probably that coin passed through MANY hands before your eye caught site on it.
_________________ Richard S. Cooper
You may be only one person in the world, but you may also be the world to one person.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
eagamesExpert Member
Posts: 3013 Joined: 15 Nov 2005
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 2:43 pm |
|
|
I see many modern errors like off centers but hardly ever see older ones (without a big price). Maybe it's because when they rolled all coins the drastic errors like off centers did not fit in the rolls so they found them. On later years they shipped bags by weight without rolling the coins so anything can be in it.
That might be one reason that even a nice older MAD or off center gets more attention.
BUT base prices on actual sales not on asking prices.
_________________ Ed
|
|
|
|
|
 |
cnladueVeteran Member
Posts: 257 Joined: 20 Mar 2008 Location: sacramento
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:29 am |
|
|
here are a couple of mine from the 60s
_________________ The opinions that I express do often reflect stupidity.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
cnladueVeteran Member
Posts: 257 Joined: 20 Mar 2008 Location: sacramento
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 1:54 pm |
|
|
this post made me dig out my 60s and now i am confussed about the reverse.Nds could you please show a pic of your reverse-you say it is not affected but how could that be?or do i have two different things going on here?
_________________ The opinions that I express do often reflect stupidity.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Bob PSite Admin
Posts: 3482 Joined: 01 Jul 2003 Location: Niceville, Florida
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 7:47 pm |
|
|
The difference is a misaligned die (MAD) versus an off center strike. The MAD would only account for one side or the other...normally the hammer die (obverse on most). The off center strike would affect both side of the coin, usually by the same amount on both sides. So..your 1964 cent is an off center strike, the 68S I am not sure of...maybe a broadstrike or nothing, the 66 is an off center, and the last of your pics looks like it may be broadstruck. Is it larger in diameter than the normal cent??
_________________ Bob Piazza
Site Admin/Moderator
Attributer/Photographer
bobp@coppercoins.com
mustbebob1@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
 |
cnladueVeteran Member
Posts: 257 Joined: 20 Mar 2008 Location: sacramento
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 9:44 pm |
|
|
Does this mean it would be impossible to have a mad now?I am eluding to the process the mints use fow a while now,dont know the correct term...maybe sqeeze is in the term?and the last one seems to be the same size.
_________________ The opinions that I express do often reflect stupidity.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|