| Author |
Message |
 kenSenior Member
Posts: 584
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Location: Phila.,Pa.
|
|
 Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:34 pm |
 |
|
Hi everyone  Came across this yesterday and it looks like #1 but doesn't have any of the markers.What do you think?Best I can do with the pics.  Thanks in advance,Ken
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 GarryNExpert Member
Posts: 1296
Joined: 09 Jul 2003
Location: Chicago
|
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:11 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Bob PSite Admin
Posts: 3482
Joined: 01 Jul 2003
Location: Niceville, Florida
|
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 4:24 pm |
|
|
Ken,
RPM #1 is the only one with a spread that wide although it looks like your secondary mintmark is tilted somewhat. RPM #1's secondary mintmark is parallel to the primary's with a pretty nice spread to the southwest. I just can't be 100% sure based on your pics. Off hand, I would say yours is NOT RPM #1. Here is a pic of RPM #1. If you want to send it to me, I can verify if it is #1, or if it is a new one.
_________________
Bob Piazza
Site Admin/Moderator
Attributer/Photographer
bobp@coppercoins.com
mustbebob1@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
kenSenior Member
Posts: 584
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Location: Phila.,Pa.
|
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:26 am |
|
|
|
Thank yo for the responses.It is parallel in hand,but as I said,no markers match.That point on the upside down pic may be remnants of a 3rd punch,I'm not sure.I'll email you doe details on shipping it to you.Ken
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bob PSite Admin
Posts: 3482
Joined: 01 Jul 2003
Location: Niceville, Florida
|
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 3:31 pm |
|
|
Ken,
Sounds good, but if you are pretty sure it looks like #1, then it probably is. As far as markers matching, yours is in circulated condition, and some of the markers may not be visible now. I will still be more than happy to examine it for you.
_________________
Bob Piazza
Site Admin/Moderator
Attributer/Photographer
bobp@coppercoins.com
mustbebob1@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
