| Author |
Message |
KurtSSenior Member
Posts: 875 Joined: 15 Feb 2008
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 12:21 am |
|
|
Lately I've been finding many coins of Sweden with repunched letters and dates. Either they're common, or I know where to look.
Here's another example where the R in ORE shows a second outline on both sides of the letter.
For instance, the serifs appear to be extended and a few contours on the right side of R are clearly extended or doubled.
At first, I thought this might be a doubled die, but nothing else nearby is doubled.
Also, if the die were double-hubbed, I'd expect to see at least some small offset on those doubled serifs.
Instead, they are perfectly aligned outward. My guess is this letter was intentionally repunched or re-engraved on the die.
Perhaps the first impression of this letter was weak, or the die was somehow damaged? Whatever the cause, it's an interesting detail.
Last edited by KurtS on Sun Nov 23, 2008 12:44 am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
 |
eagamesExpert Member
Posts: 3013 Joined: 15 Nov 2005
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 12:28 am |
|
|
Maybe maybe LOL it might be that they used a convex master to make it so that's why it shows best on the center. Yes a wild guess
Maybe Longacre was moonlighting as their advisor
_________________ Ed
|
|
|
|
|
 |
KurtSSenior Member
Posts: 875 Joined: 15 Feb 2008
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 12:51 am |
|
|
Right--that could easily be it, although I might expect to see some shifting evident on the ends of serifs? For instance, there is a slight angle to the secondary image of the vertical main stroke, but the serifs and the top of the R show no displacement. On another contemporary coin, the IHC, I'd expect to see something there. Of course--there the date was added after hubbing.
Anyway it's a minor detail--and just a few wild guesses/thinking out loud. I don't see much evidence of shoulders on die tools on larger devices of this period...some are on small date punches to be sure.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
DickExpert Member
Posts: 5780 Joined: 21 Sep 2006 Location: Rialto, CA.
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 2:37 am |
|
|
Kurt, that is an interesting coin. I see the "effect" you mention, and The thought MD comes to mind, and then I ask HOW? I don't see anything out of the ordinary, on any of the other devices, or date. Nice coin!
Dick
_________________ " Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before".
|
|
|
|
|
 |
daggitSenior Member
Posts: 560 Joined: 26 Oct 2007 Location: Canada
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 10:28 am |
|
|
|
Geez Kurt I love the photo's you take, your images are so clear!
|
|
|
|
|
 |
KurtSSenior Member
Posts: 875 Joined: 15 Feb 2008
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 10:42 am |
|
|
Daggit,
Thanks to my Nikon macro lens...it borders on being a microscope. Of course, on the downside it picks out every blemish on a coin, including some I cannot see.
Dick,
Yes--I considered MD too, except the extension on the left serifs moves the other direction, and it's too well-defined for some kind of die deterioration, imo.
I'm reminded of this Newfoundland coin I have that shows the date re-engraved on the die:
|
|
|
|
|
 |
DickExpert Member
Posts: 5780 Joined: 21 Sep 2006 Location: Rialto, CA.
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 11:40 am |
|
|
OOh, that's a real goodie! Kurt, you did it again!
Dick
_________________ " Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before".
|
|
|
|
|
 |
KurtSSenior Member
Posts: 875 Joined: 15 Feb 2008
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 11:50 am |
|
|
Dick, that's a documented variety--and I bought it attributed a while ago. It's a good reminder of what a re-engraved die might look like.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
DickExpert Member
Posts: 5780 Joined: 21 Sep 2006 Location: Rialto, CA.
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 4:30 pm |
|
|
Kurt, that's a good idea. Nothing like having the "real thing" to compare a doubtful one to.
Dick
_________________ " Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before".
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|