| Author |
Message |
drwstr123Member
Posts: 97
Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Location: jackson, nj
|
|
 Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2006 6:53 pm |
 |
|
I'd be interested in your opinion:
|
|
|
|
|
 |
drwstr123Member
Posts: 97
Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Location: jackson, nj
|
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 4:31 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 smedSenior Member
Posts: 624
Joined: 21 Oct 2003
Location: Zephyrhills Florida
|
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 9:12 pm |
|
|
opinion on what?
strike: very nice
grade: 60
toning: fugly
luster: so-so
eye appeal: yuck
_________________
Life Member American Numismatic Association (ANA), Pensacola Numismatic Society
Life Member American Veterans (AmVets), Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW), Fleet Reserve Association (FRA)
Member Loyal Order of Moose
Member American Legion
|
|
|
|
|
|
GabeSenior Member
Posts: 691
Joined: 11 Jul 2003
Location: Gainesville, FL
|
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 12:16 am |
|
|
I dont know... I think it grades MS62, but I dont know much about Morgans anyways.
_________________
-Gabe
|
|
|
|
|
|
drwstr123Member
Posts: 97
Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Location: jackson, nj
|
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 6:02 am |
|
|
|
Hey, Thanks for the get back. So far, I'm with you. I consider Morgans the most ugly save for moderns. It's the mintmark I'm asking about. Gonna take another pic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
drwstr123Member
Posts: 97
Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Location: jackson, nj
|
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 7:21 am |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 GarryNExpert Member
Posts: 1296
Joined: 09 Jul 2003
Location: Chicago
|
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 8:21 pm |
|
|
|
it looks like the mint mark might be filled? I dont happen to have an 1878 S, but it looks like the tyical mint mark for that series. The toning is not too bad, I have a couple dollars with thatr type of toning. kind of a light russet. Maybe if we had a closer look at the mark. Does it look like it might be repunched drwstr?
|
|
|
|
|
|
GarryNExpert Member
Posts: 1296
Joined: 09 Jul 2003
Location: Chicago
|
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 8:37 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
drwstr123Member
Posts: 97
Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Location: jackson, nj
|
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:20 am |
|
|
Thanks to all. Digital is fantastic. I'm seeing things in the pics that don't easily come out under glass. It's a squashed MM:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
