coppercoins.com
 
Index div  FAQ  div  Search  div  Memberlist  div  Usergroups  div  Register  div  Log in 
back to coppercoins home
Username:    Password:      Log me on automatically each visit    
coppercoins.com Forum Index arrow New Finds - Die Varieties and Varieties arrow 1965

1965
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Author Message

daggit
Senior Member
Senior Member

Posts: 560
Joined: 26 Oct 2007
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Sun Feb 03, 2008 8:51 pm Reply with quote

I have no other 65 to compare this with, the top of the 6 appears to have a notch in it and I'm not sure whats going on with the rest of the date. My untrained eye cannot discern if this is a Doubled Die or if the 65's commonly have this look to them. Any comments appreciated. My camera is acting up sorry about the poor quality photo it's taken with the scope.


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

coop
Expert Member
Expert Member

Posts: 3402
Joined: 17 Sep 2003
Location: Arizona
PostPosted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:57 am Reply with quote

I see two different light sources on your image. One above and one below. With that type of lighting everthing looks larger. The best is to have just one light source. If you are getting unwanted light, remove one. I use a facial tissue to block the unwanted light. How do you know when you have a second light source? By placing your hand around your scope to block out unwanted light. When you determine the direction, curtain that off with a facial tissue with tape/piece of carboard just to block the unwanted/secondary light source. Try to nail this down and look again. Sometimes the dual lighting is the problem. But you need this correcting first to see if your coin is a doubled die. (Also compare to more normal coins.)Why? Because designs obverse/reverse change from year to year. Sometimes every 1/2 year. So examining coins from the same year/type will answer if this is common. (IE: 1959 Cents the 5 on the date has a notch on the center cross piece. They all have that, just part of the design. 1961 on the upper tail of the six in the date has a missing part of the tail. Normal as they all have that. 2001-2003 Have the wider letters/numbers. They all have this. You just need to compare to see if other coins contain the same anomoly to see what is the norm for this years/type of coins.
_________________
Richard S. Cooper
You may be only one person in the world, but you may also be the world to one person.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Page 1 of 1
coppercoins.com Forum Index arrow New Finds - Die Varieties and Varieties arrow 1965




coppercoins.com © 2001-2005 All times are GMT - 6 Hours