| Author |
Message |
 RhubarbSenior Member
Posts: 856
Joined: 24 Jan 2007
Location: West Georgia
|
|
 Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 11:33 am |
 |
|
There is a line inside the Upper MM running E/W. There seems to be a split to the S/W of the MM.
Thank's
Rhubarb
_________________
There is no shame in not knowing; the shame lies in not finding
out.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 Bob PSite Admin
Posts: 3482
Joined: 01 Jul 2003
Location: Niceville, Florida
|
|
| Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 12:41 pm |
|
|
Rhubarb,
I don't see this as being the RPM 002. It is difficult to tell based on the wear on the coin, but the mintmark position is wrong as well.
By the way, these posts should go under the threads of US Copper Coin varieties. RPMs or doubled dies are not considered errors...but varieties. OK?
_________________
Bob Piazza
Site Admin/Moderator
Attributer/Photographer
bobp@coppercoins.com
mustbebob1@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
RhubarbSenior Member
Posts: 856
Joined: 24 Jan 2007
Location: West Georgia
|
|
| Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 2:21 pm |
|
|
| Bob P wrote: |
Rhubarb,
I don't see this as being the RPM 002. It is difficult to tell based on the wear on the coin, but the mintmark position is wrong as well.
By the way, these posts should go under the threads of US Copper Coin varieties. RPMs or doubled dies are not considered errors...but varieties. OK? |
Thank's Bob,
I have a new scope that I can look at the coins on the screen. Everything look's like something when I haven't looked in a while. I was frustrated with my camera abilities to take photo's. I can see thing's more clearly though with the scope. Thank's for the input. By the way your right about the coins being worn, I'm going thru the ones's I've had for several year. Thank's again. I will correct my postings to the proper category from now on. If I don't "Remind Me"
Rhubarb
_________________
There is no shame in not knowing; the shame lies in not finding
out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
